The prescription pad as politically correct authority

August 22, 2014 § 10 Comments

When it comes to mental illness and mood, we have to acknowledge that a small percentage of people are not fit to look after themselves.  They need constant adult supervision or else they will become a danger to themselves and/or others.

But modernity values freedom – personal autonomy – above all else, which is actually why our politics becomes so tyrannical; and the idea of grown human beings placed under the authority of other flawed human beings is anathema.

Enter the prescription pad. Even though a drug like alcohol objectively has a similar profile of risks and benefits for improving mood to other drugs, it is unsuitable because it cannot be an instrument of social control. So the use of alcohol to improve mood must be frowned upon, even though going on a bender with the boys to get over a bad breakup might be a healthy thing to do, within limits.  A war must be waged on strong psychotropics on one front; while on another front psychotropics must be brought under the supervision of experts, and heaven help you if you ‘go off your meds’ even when they make you feel awful and destroy your health.

So the sociological purpose of the prescription pad is twofold. One of its key functions is to place you under authority while pretending not to place you under authority. The other key function is to control the information flow and narrative around the use of psychotropic drugs. Naturally the ‘experts’ who wield this chemical power on behalf of the State would rather you didn’t see it that way.

The genie is already out of the bottle when it comes to alcohol, so it cannot be used as a means of social control. With alcohol you are free to wake up from the bender, drink lots of water, take a few asprin, and get on with your life without carrying the subordinate label ‘mental patient’ into your future.  And we can’t have that.

§ 10 Responses to The prescription pad as politically correct authority

  • Scott W. says:

    You would think the very existence of the expression “off his meds” would be a clue.

  • josh says:

    Alcohol (along with other drugs and sexual promiscuity) is encouraged in young adults and college students as a means of social control.

  • Exfernal says:

    Is as easy to overdose alcohol (with permanent consequences, up to and including death) as other drugs? Like marijuana, for example?

    I see a false equivalence here.

  • JustSomeGuy says:

    Is as easy to overdose alcohol (with permanent consequences, up to and including death) as other drugs?

    That depends on which drug in particular is being discussed. However, you’re attempting to shift to an irrelevant frame. Your doctor won’t prescribe you an overdose of cocaine.

    However, he might prescribe you – and indeed he does prescribe thousands of people – an overdose of Ativan.

    Red Herring, much?

  • Zippy says:

    Just about any drug can poison you to death if you take enough of it. But as JSG says, that is a red herring, because the issue is that they cause suicide and violent behavior at ‘therapeutic’ doses.

  • […] of people fed, sheltered, and pacified. Fake technological advances (e.g. in medicine) provide a way for authority to pacify potential troublemakers with stupefying drugs while pretending that they are not exercising authority and that the stupefying, health-destroying […]

  • […] and contraception, if you are cisgender.  For the time being, until you and your surgeon and your psychiatrist change your minds and decide to rearrange your […]

  • […] Prescription drugs are much more dangerous than alcohol, perhaps innately but without question because of social context. You have to count on your dealer and his supplier to watch out for your best interests, as you doff your cap to the medical aristocracy. […]

  • […] Back in the day the insanity defense provided a kind of compromise or unprincipled exception as a way of saving liberalism from itself.  Liberalism requires public-square neutrality, so the liberal ruling class must prescind from making moral judgments. Disease is unlike moral failure inasmuch as moral agents are culpable for their moral failures but are not (necessarily) morally culpable for contracting a disease or having some sort of defect.  Under the insanity defense heinous criminals could be defined as ‘sick’, thus avoiding making substantive moral judgments while at the same time still asserting a form of politically correct authority. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The prescription pad as politically correct authority at Zippy Catholic.